1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DOMINION ASSETS LLC v. MASIMO CORPORATION
 

DOMINION ASSETS LLC v. MASIMO CORPORATION

Case No. 14-cv-03002-BLF.

DOMINION ASSETS LLC, Plaintiff, v. MASIMO CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

November 9, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dominion Assets LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Bruce J. Wecker , Hausfeld LLP.

Dominion Assets LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher L. Lebsock , Hausfeld LLP & Robert Joseph Yorio , Carr & Ferrell LLP.

Masimo Corporation, Defendant, represented by Brian Christopher Claassen , Knobbe, Martens, Olson and Bear LLP, Joseph Robert Re , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP, Stephen Chris Jensen , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP & Irfan Ahmed Lateef , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.

Cercacor Laboratories, Inc, Defendant, represented by Brian Christopher Claassen , Knobbe, Martens, Olson and Bear LLP, Joseph Robert Re , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP, Stephen Chris Jensen , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP & Irfan Ahmed Lateef , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.

Masimo Corporation, Counter-claimant, represented by Brian Christopher Claassen , Knobbe, Martens, Olson and Bear LLP & Irfan Ahmed Lateef , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.

Dominion Assets LLC, Counter-defendant, represented by Bruce J. Wecker , Hausfeld LLP & Robert Joseph Yorio , Carr & Ferrell LLP.

Cercacor Laboratories, Inc, Counter-claimant, represented by Brian Christopher Claassen , Knobbe, Martens, Olson and Bear LLP & Irfan Ahmed Lateef , Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.

Dominion Assets LLC, Counter-defendant, represented by Bruce J. Wecker , Hausfeld LLP & Robert Joseph Yorio , Carr & Ferrell LLP.

ORDER RE SEALING MOTION

[Re: ECF 78]

This order specifically addresses Defendants' renewed administrative motion to file under seal portions of an exhibit in relation to their motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases