1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HO v. GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
 

HO v. GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN

Civ. No. 2:13-cv-6104-KM-MAH.

PAUL HO, Plaintiff, v. GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 28, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PAUL HO, Plaintiff, represented by JACK T. SPINELLA , NICOLL DAVIS & SPINELLA LLP.

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant, represented by ROBERT T. SZYBA , SEYFARTH SHAW LLP.

OPINION

Before the court are cross motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 41, 42.) The plaintiff, Paul Ho, seeks a ruling that defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential") wrongly determined that he is not eligible for benefits under a long term disability ("LTD") policy in which he was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases