1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CROSBY v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
 

CROSBY v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Civil Action No. 16-6700.

BILL CROSBY, LARRY WALKER AND BYRON TAYLOR, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY-SITUATED, v. COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUPERIOR TELECOM SERVICES, INC. SECTION I.

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.

October 27, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 0216(b)
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 0216(b) Fair Labor Standards Act
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill Crosby, Plaintiff, represented by George Brian Recile , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP.

Bill Crosby, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew Arthur Sherman , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Patrick R. Follette , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Preston Lee Hayes , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP & Ryan Paul Monsour , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP.

Larry Walker, Plaintiff, represented by George Brian Recile , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Matthew Arthur Sherman , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Patrick R. Follette , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Preston Lee Hayes , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP & Ryan Paul Monsour , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP.

Byron Taylor, Plaintiff, represented by George Brian Recile , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Matthew Arthur Sherman , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Patrick R. Follette , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP, Preston Lee Hayes , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP & Ryan Paul Monsour , Chehardy,Sherman,Ellis,Murray,Recile,Stakelum&Hayes, LLP.

Cox Communications, Inc., Defendant, represented by Martin E. Landrieu , Gordon, Arata, McCollam, Duplantis & Eagan, Annette A. Idalski , Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, pro hac vice, Donna Phillips Currault , Gordon, Arata, McCollam, Duplantis & Eagan, Peter N. Hall , Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, pro hac vice & Phillip J. Antis, Jr. , Gordon, Arata, McCollam, Duplantis & Eagan.

ORDER AND REASONS

Before the Court is the motion1 to dismiss filed by defendant Cox Communications, Inc. For the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I.

Plaintiffs, a group of former and current cable installers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases