DOE v. NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY

Civil Action No. 2:16-CV-28 (WOB-JGW).

JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY, ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Northern Division, Covington.

October 24, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane Doe, Plaintiff, represented by Kevin L. Murphy , Murphy Landen Jones, PLLC.

Jane Doe, Plaintiff, represented by Steven A. Taylor , Murphy Landen Jones, PLLC.

Northern Kentucky University, Defendant, represented by Joshua Michael Salsburey , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC, Katherine M. Coleman , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC, Barbara A. Kriz , Kriz, Jenkins, Prewitt & Jones, PSC & Patsey Ely Jacobs , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC.

Geoffrey S, Mearns, Defendant, represented by Joshua Michael Salsburey , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC, Katherine M. Coleman , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC & Barbara A. Kriz , Kriz, Jenkins, Prewitt & Jones, PSC.

Les Kachurek, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Turner , Kriz, Jenkins, Prewitt & Jones, PSC, Joshua Michael Salsburey , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC, Katherine M. Coleman , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC & Barbara A. Kriz , Kriz, Jenkins, Prewitt & Jones, PSC.

Kathleen Roberts, Defendant, represented by Joshua Michael Salsburey , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC, Katherine M. Coleman , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC & Barbara A. Kriz , Kriz, Jenkins, Prewitt & Jones, PSC.

Ann James, Defendant, represented by Joshua Michael Salsburey , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC, Katherine M. Coleman , Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney PLLC & Barbara A. Kriz , Kriz, Jenkins, Prewitt & Jones, PSC.

Gannett GP Media, Inc., Intervenor, represented by Darren W. Ford , Graydon, Head & Ritchey, LLP.

Northern Kentucky Tribune, Intervenor, represented by Kathie E. Grisham .


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on various motions (Docs. 26, 53, 54, 70, 71, 72, 90, 98).

The Court heard oral argument on these motions on Tuesday, October 18, 2016. (Doc. 106). The Court now enters its Order explaining the reasons for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases