1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BARR v. ONE TOUCH DIRECT
 

BARR v. ONE TOUCH DIRECT

Case No. 8:15-cv-2391-T-33MAP.

ALFRED BARR, Plaintiff, v. ONE TOUCH DIRECT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

October 14, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred Barr, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

One Touch Direct, LLC, Defendant, represented by Christine E. Howard , Fisher & Phillips LLP & Matthew David Westerman , Fisher & Phillips LLP.

Joseph Mole, Defendant, represented by Matthew David Westerman , Fisher & Phillips LLP.

Christopher Reed, Defendant, represented by Matthew David Westerman , Fisher & Phillips LLP.

AT&T Services Inc., Defendant, represented by Matthew David Westerman , Fisher & Phillips, LLP.

DPG Employee Leasing LLC, Defendant, represented by Matthew David Westerman , Fisher & Phillips LLP.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court in consideration of pro se Plaintiff Alfred Barr's Motion for Rehearing (Doc. # 127), which, for reasons stated more fully below, the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases