DAN EOFF, Plaintiff/Counter, Defendant,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; and GINA McCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the EPA Defendants/Counter Claimants.
United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 29, 2016.
September 29, 2016.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Cause: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nature of Suit: 899 Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Dan Eoff, Plaintiff, represented by Charles A. Banks , Banks Law Firm, PLLC.
Dan Eoff, Plaintiff, represented by J. Grant Ballard , Banks Law Firm, PLLC & Kent Tester , Law Office of Kent Tester, P.A..
Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant, represented by Eileen T. McDonough , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Defense Section, John E. Sullivan , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Defense Section & Lisa M. Bell , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Enforcement.
Gina McCarthy, iDefendant, represented by Eileen T. McDonough , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Defense Section.
Gina McCarthy, Defendant, represented by John E. Sullivan , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Defense Section & Lisa M. Bell , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Enforcement.
Gina McCarthy, Counter Claimant, represented by Eileen T. McDonough , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Defense Section, John E. Sullivan , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Enforcement & Lisa M. Bell , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Enforcement.
Environmental Protection Agency, Counter Claimant, represented by Eileen T. McDonough , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Defense Section, John E. Sullivan , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Defense Section & Lisa M. Bell , U. S. Department of Justice - Environmental Enforcement.
The stay, No 83, is lifted. All material things considered, the Court approves the parties' settlement and will enter the consent decree embodying it. United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District,952 F.2d 1040, 1044 (8th Cir. 1992...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
