CITY OF WYOMING, City of Mankato, Chisago Lakes Joint Sewage Treatment Commission, Sauk Centre Public Utilities Commission, Village of Holmen, City of Fergus Falls, City of Elk River, and City of Princeton, Plaintiffs,
v.
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Nice-Pak Products, Inc., Professional Disposables International, Inc., Tufco Technologies Inc., and Rockline Industries, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Daniel E. Gustafson , GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC, 120 South Sixth Street, Suite 2600, Minneapolis, MN 55402; Simon Bahne Paris , SALTZ, MONGELUZZI, BARRETT & BENDESKY, PC, 1650 Market Street, Fifty-Second Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103; and Kristin J. Moody , BERMAN DEVALERIO, One California Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94111, for plaintiffs.
Emily Johnson Henn , COVINGTON & BURLING LLP, 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700, Redwood Shores, CA 94065, and Nicole M. Moen , FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA, 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendant Procter & Gamble Company.
Kara L. McCall , SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, One South Dearborn, Suite 3300, Chicago, IL 60603, and Tracy J. Van Steenburgh , NILAN JOHNSON LEWIS PA, 120 South Sixth Street, Suite 400, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
Karl A. Bekeny and Michael J. Ruttinger , TUCKER ELLIS LLP, 950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100, Cleveland, OH 44113, for defendants Nice-Pak Products, Inc., and Professional Disposables International, Inc.
Aaron D. Van Oort , FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP, 90 South Seventh Street, Suite 2200, Minneapolis, MN 55402, and Jason Heinz Anderson , STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH P.C., 660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600, Newport Beach, CA 92660, for defendant Tufco Technologies Inc.
Jerry W. Blackwell and S. Jamal Faleel , BLACKWELL BURKE PA, 431 South Seventh Street, Suite 2500, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for defendant Rockline Industries.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge United States District Court.
Hygienic wipes labeled and sold as "flushable" have caused and are continuing to cause increased costs and property damage to the governmental entities that operate sewer systems and water treatment facilities. These "flushable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
