ARUNACHALAM v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

Civ. No. 16-281-RGA.

DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

September 26, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

International Business Machines Corporation, Defendant, represented by David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Kevin J. Culligan , pro hac vice & Mark J. Abate , pro hac vice.

SAP America Inc., Defendant, represented by David Ellis Moore , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Bindu Ann George Palapura , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Joseph M. Beauchamp , pro hac vice & Tharan Gregory Lanier , pro hac vice.

J.P. Morgan Chase and Company, Defendant, represented by Robert Scott Saunders , Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Jessica R. Kunz , Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

At Wilmington this 26th day of September, 2016:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse (D.I. 62) ("Recusal Motion") is DENIED, the government's Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 33) ("Dismissal Motion") is GRANTED, and Judge Andrews is DISMISSED as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases