1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KNICK v. SCOTT TOWNSHIP
 

KNICK v. SCOTT TOWNSHIP

Civil Action No. 3:14-CV-02223.

ROSE MARY KNICK, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT TOWNSHIP, Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

September 7, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rose Mary Knick, Plaintiff, represented by Frank J. Bolock, Jr. , Bolock Law.

Rose Mary Knick, Plaintiff, represented by J. David Breemer , Pacific Legal Foundation.

Scott Township, Defendant, represented by Mark Joseph Kozlowski , Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin & William J. McPartland , Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin.

MEMORANDUM

Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Rose Mary Knick's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC," Doc. 21) filed by Defendant Scott Township. Plaintiff's SAC asserts claims for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for an unlawful search and seizure of her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases