1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DUNCAN v. THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY
 

DUNCAN v. THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY

Case No. 2:16-cv-00293-TLN-KJN.

THEO DUNCAN, Plaintiff, v. THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division.

August 31, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Contract Dispute
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theo Duncan, Plaintiff, represented by Randolph Gaw , Gaw; Poe LLP.

Theo Duncan, Plaintiff, represented by Mark W. Poe , Morrison and Foerster LLP & Victor Meng Gaw; Poe LLP.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Defendant, represented by Geoffrey J. Moul , pro hac vice, Brad A. McDowell , Smith, McDowell & Powell, Christopher Todd Holland , Keller, Sloan, Roman & Holland LLP & Ethan Isaac Jacobs , Keller, Sloan, Roman & Holland LLP.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND CONTINUING HEARING DATE

Plaintiff Theo Duncan and Defendant The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, by stipulation, agreed that the Defendant's deadline to file a reply memorandum in support of its Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases