1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CHAPMAN v. PEERY
 

CHAPMAN v. PEERY

Case No. 13-cv-02301-YGR (PR).

KENNETH CHARLES CHAPMAN, Petitioner, v. SUZANNE M. PEERY, Warden, et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 25, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth Charles Chapman, Petitioner, Pro Se.

Suzanne M. Peery, Respondent, represented by Pamela K. Critchfield , CA State Attorney General's Office.

Warren L. Montgomery, Respondent, represented by Pamela K. Critchfield , CA State Attorney General's Office.

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Before the Court is Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. 31.

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not apply in habeas corpus actions. See Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases