1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DURHAM v. VARANO
 

DURHAM v. VARANO

No. 2:11-cv-719.

GEORGE M. DURHAM, HN-4374, Petitioner, v. DAVID A. VARANO, et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

July 5, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

GEORGE M. DURHAM, Petitioner, Pro Se.

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER, Respondent, represented by Ahmed T. Aziz , Office of the District Attorney of Beaver County.

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

Presently before the Court for disposition is a pro se Rule 60(b) motion filed by the petitioner (ECF No.83). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be dismissed as a successive petition filed without leave from the Court of Appeals, and because reasonable jurists could...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases