AN GIANG FISHERIES IMP. & EXP. JOINT STOCK v. U.S.

Slip Op. 16-55 Consol. Court No. 14-00109.

179 F.Supp.3d 1256 (2016)

AN GIANG FISHERIES IMPORT AND EXPORT JOINT STOCK COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Consolidated Plaintiffs, and Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers et al., Plaintiff-Intervenor and Consolidated Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Catfish Farmers of America et al., Defendant-Intervenor and Consolidated Defendant Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

June 7, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew Jon McConkey , Mayer Brown LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs An Giang Fisheries Import and Export Joint Stock Company et al.

Ned Herman Marshak , Andrew Thomas Schutz , and Dharmendra Narain Choudhary , Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, of New York, NY and Washington, DC, argued for consolidated plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers. With them on the brief was Andrew Brehm Schroth.

John Joseph Kenkel , deKieffer & Horgan PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for consolidated plaintiff Binh An Seafood Joint Stock Company. With him on the brief was J. Kevin Horgan.

Nazakhtar Nikakhtar and Jonathan Mario Zielinski , Cassidy Levy Kent (USA) LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for consolidated plaintiffs and defendant-intervenors Catfish Farmers of America et al. With them on the brief was Nathaniel James Halvorson.

Ryan Michael Majerus , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant. With him on the brief were Benjamin C. Mizer , Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Franklin E. White, Jr. , Assistant Director. Of Counsel on the brief was David W. Richardson , Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.


OPINION AND ORDER

This consolidated action comes before the court on USCIT Rule 56.2 motions for judgment on the agency record, challenging the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") determination in the ninth administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering certain frozen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases