1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. G&P INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES, LLC v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
 

G&P INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES, LLC v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Case No. 2:15-cv-00907-JCM-NJK.

G&P INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendant(s).

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

May 27, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G & P Investment Enterprises, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Michael V. Infuso , Greene Infuso, LLP, Shawn L Walkenshaw , Pisanelli Bice, PLLC, Zachary P. Takos , Takos Law, Ltd. & Keith W Barlow .

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Casey G. Perkins , Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Justin A Shiroff , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. & Richard Gordon , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P..

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Defendant, represented by Casey G. Perkins , Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Justin A Shiroff , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. & Richard Gordon , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P..

Federal Housing Finance Agency, Intervenor, represented by Leslie Bryan Hart , Fennemore Craig, P.C..

Federal Housing Finance Agency, Counter Claimant, represented by Leslie Bryan Hart , Fennemore Craig, P.C..

G & P Investment Enterprises, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Michael V. Infuso , Greene Infuso, LLP, Shawn L Walkenshaw , Pisanelli Bice, PLLC, Zachary P. Takos , Takos Law, Ltd. & Keith W Barlow .

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Justin A Shiroff , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. & Richard Gordon , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P..

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Counter Claimant, represented by Casey G. Perkins , Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Justin A Shiroff , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. & Richard Gordon , Snell & Wilmer L.L.P..

G & P Investment Enterprises, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Michael V. Infuso , Greene Infuso, LLP, Shawn L Walkenshaw , Pisanelli Bice, PLLC, Zachary P. Takos , Takos Law, Ltd. & Keith W Barlow .

ATC Assessment Collection Group, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Troy R. Dickerson , Angius & Terry LLP.

Sunrise Villas II and III Homeowner's Association, Counter Defendant, represented by Edward D Boyack , Boyack Orme & Taylor.

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the stay already in place. Docket No. 73. For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the stipulation in part as follows. Discovery in this case shall be stayed for up to 120 further days. In the event the pending motions for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases