1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CITY OF MONTICELLO v. SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.
 

CITY OF MONTICELLO v. SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.

No. 5:15-cv-127-DPM.

CITY OF MONTICELLO, ARKANSAS, Plaintiff, v. SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division.

May 24, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monticello Arkansas, City of, Plaintiff, represented by Charles C. Gibson, III , Gibson & Keith, PLLC.

City ofMonticello Arkansas, Plaintiff, represented by Lee Douglas Curry , Gibson & Keith, PLLC.

Siemens Industry Inc, Defendant, represented by Don S. McKinney , Adams and Reese LLP, Justin J. Boron , Adams and Reese LLP, pro hac vice & Philip A. Franco , Adams and Reese LLP, pro hac vice.

City ofMonticello Arkansas, represented by Charles C. Gibson, III , Gibson & Keith, PLLC & Lee Douglas Curry , Gibson & Keith, PLLC.

Siemens Industry Inc, Defendant, represented by Don S. McKinney , Adams and Reese LLP, Justin J. Boron , Adams and Reese LLP & Philip A. Franco , Adams and Reese LLP.

ORDER

Motion, No 117, granted. The parties may file one joint report on the disputed privilege issues. Neither side may exceed fifteen pages. The Court requests that Siemens take three further steps: redo the privilege log so that the headings appear on every page; file copies of all the disputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases