1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 188 F.Supp.3d
  5. 188 F.Supp.3d 658 (2016)
 

BRUSTER v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC.

CASE NO. 15-CV-2653.

188 F.Supp.3d 658 (2016)

Ladon BRUSTER, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio.

Signed May 23, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeanne Lahiff , Imbesi Law, Marie Napoli , Napoli Shkolnik, New York, NY, Scott D. Simpkins , John R. Climaco , Climaco, Wilcox, Peca, Tarantino & Garofoli, Cleveland, OH, for Plaintiff.

Andrew M. Spurchise , Littler Mendelson, New York, NY, Edward H. Chyun , Littler Mendelson, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants.

OPINION & ORDER

Plaintiff Ladon Bruster brings Ohio wage and labor law claims against Defendants Uber Technologies Inc. and its subsidiary, Rasier, LLC (collectively, "Uber").1 Defendants move to dismiss this case and compel arbitration under the terms of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases