PRM KAUAI, LLC v. GIBSON

Civil No. 14-00164 DKW-KSC.

PRM KAUAI, LLC and PETER R. MORRIS, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES GIBSON and BANCENTRE CORP., Defendants. and PAHIO MARKETING, INC., Intervenor/Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Hawai`i.

May 18, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PRM Kauai, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Jessica M. Wan , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon, Jordon Jun Kimura , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP & William C. McCorriston , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon.

Peter R. Morris, Plaintiff, represented by Jordon Jun Kimura , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP & William C. McCorriston , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon.

James Gibson, Defendant, represented by Mark M. Murakami , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert, Edward K. Pineda-Akiona , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert, Matthew T. Evans , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert & Sommerset K. M. Wong , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert.

Bancentre Corp., Defendant, represented by Mark M. Murakami , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert, Matthew T. Evans , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert & Sommerset K. M. Wong , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert.

Pahio Marketing, Inc., Intervenor Defendant, represented by Gregory Howard Meyers .

Bancentre Corp., Counter Claimant, represented by Mark M. Murakami , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert & Matthew T. Evans , Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert.

Kauai Beach Villas--Phase II, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by William C. McCorriston , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon.

Pahio Marketing, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Gregory Howard Meyers .

Peter R. Morris, Counter Defendant, represented by Jordon Jun Kimura , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP & William C. McCorriston , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon.

PRM Kauai, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Jessica M. Wan , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon, Jordon Jun Kimura , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP & William C. McCorriston , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The parties agree that diversity and federal question jurisdiction, the most common bases cited for subject matter jurisdiction before this Court, do not exist in this case. See 28 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases