ALINA BEKKERMAN; BRANDON GRIFFITH; JENNY LEE; and CHARLES LISSER, Plaintiffs and Petitioners,
v.
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; AT&T, INC.; SPRINT CORPORATION; T-MOBILE US, INC.; VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive, Defendants and Respondents.
United States District Court, E.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
California Board of Equalization, Defendant, represented by Michael Sapoznikow , California Department of Justice & Nhan Thien Vu , State of California Department of Justice.
State of California, Defendant, represented by Michael Sapoznikow , California Department of Justice & Nhan Thien Vu , State of California Department of Justice.
Sprint Corporation, Defendant, represented by Fred R. Puglisi , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP.
T-Mobile US, Inc., Defendant, represented by Rochelle L. Wilcox , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
Verizon Communications, Inc., Defendant, represented by Henry Weissmann , Munger, Tolles & Olson Llp.
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Alina Bekkerman, Brandon Griffith, Jenny Lee, and Charles Lisser (collectively "Plaintiffs"), on the one hand, and Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC ("AT&T"), Sprint Solutions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
