BENEDICT v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

Case No. 13-cv-00119-BLF.

ERIC BENEDICT, Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

May 13, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric Benedict, Plaintiff, represented by Kelly M. Dermody , Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Adam T. Klein , Outten & Golden LLP, pro hac vice, Anne Brackett Shaver , Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Daniel M. Hutchinson , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Jahan C. Sagafi , OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP, Jennifer Lin Liu , Outten & Golden LLP, Juno E. Turner , Outten and Golden LLP, pro hac vice, Martin Daniel Quinones , Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann and Bernstein, LLP, Nantiya Ruan , University of Denver College of Law, Olivia J Quinto , Outten and Golden LLP, pro hac vice & Paul William Mollica , Outten and Golden LLP, pro hac vice.

Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant, represented by Wendy M. Lazerson , Sidley Austin LLP, David Ryan Carpenter , Sidley Austin LLP, Mark E. Haddad , Sidley Austin Brown & Wood & Max Fischer , Sidley Austin LLP.

Hewlett-Packard Company, Counter-claimant, represented by Wendy M. Lazerson , Sidley Austin LLP & Max Fischer , Sidley Austin LLP.

Eric Benedict, Counter-defendant, represented by Kelly M. Dermody , Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Adam T. Klein , Outten & Golden LLP, Daniel M. Hutchinson , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Jahan C. Sagafi , OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP & Juno E. Turner , Outten and Golden LLP.

Hewlett-Packard Company, Counter-claimant, represented by Wendy M. Lazerson , Sidley Austin LLP, David Ryan Carpenter , Sidley Austin LLP, Mark E. Haddad , Sidley Austin Brown & Wood & Max Fischer , Sidley Austin LLP.

Eric Benedict, Counter-defendant, represented by Kelly M. Dermody , Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, Adam T. Klein , Outten & Golden LLP, Daniel M. Hutchinson , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Jahan C. Sagafi , OUTTEN & GOLDEN LLP & Juno E. Turner , Outten and Golden LLP.


ORDER RE STIPULATION REGARDING MODIFIED SCHEDULE FOR BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DECERTIFY FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION

[Re: ECF 410].

The parties have stipulated that "Plaintiffs and Defendant will be able to use testimony obtained through the deposition of Ms. Holiday in support of their Opposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases