MARSHA K. DUGAS, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Darryl S. Dugas, Plaintiff,
v.
3M COMPANY, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 29, 2016.
March 29, 2016.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Marsha K. Dugas, Plaintiff, represented by Alan M. Pickert, Terrell Hogan, PA, Case A. Dam, The Lanier Law Firm, H.W. Trey Jones, Lanier Law Firm, pro hac vice, Mark A. Linder, Lanier Law Firm, pro hac vice & W. Mark Lanier, The Lanier Law Firm, pro hac vice.
3M Company, Defendant, represented by Byron N. Miller, Thompson Miller & Simpson PLC, pro hac vice, Dara D. Mann, Dentons US LLP, pro hac vice, Jerry W. Blackwell, Blackwell Burke P.A., pro hac vice, Mary A. Wells, Wells, Anderson & Race LLC, pro hac vice, Monica L. Irel, Dentons US LLP & Sada J. Baby, Dentons US LLP, pro hac vice.
IMO Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Eduardo J. Medina, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL, Melanie E. Chung-Tims, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL, Neil Anthony Covone, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL & Susan J. Cole, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL.
United Technologies Corporation, Defendant, represented by Eduardo J. Medina, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL, Knight S. Anderson, Tucker Ellis LLP, pro hac vice, Melanie E. Chung-Tims, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL, Neil Anthony Covone, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL & Susan J. Cole, Bice Cole Law Firm, PL.
Dexter Hysol Aerospace, LLC, Defendant, represented by Billie Jo Taylor, Boyd & Jenerette, PA, Kristen M. Van der Linde, Boyd & Jenerette, PA & R. Scott Masterson, Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, pro hac vice.
Henkel Corporation, Defendant, represented by Billie Jo Taylor, Boyd & Jenerette, PA, Kristen M. Van der Linde, Boyd & Jenerette, PA & R. Scott Masterson, Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, pro hac vice.
Union Carbide Corporation, Defendant, represented by Joseph C. Wilson, IV, Pierce, Herns, Sloan & Wilson, LLC.
ORDER
BRIAN J. DAVIS, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant 3M Company's Motion for Exclusion of Testimony of Darell Bevis (Doc. 350) and Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 354) (collectively, the "Motions"). Plaintiff filed her Responses in Opposition (Docs. 407 and 408) and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
