1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MARTINEZ v. COUNTY OF SONOMA
 

MARTINEZ v. COUNTY OF SONOMA

Case No. 3:15-cv-01953-JST.

MYRAH MARTINEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

February 17, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Myrah Martinez, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

Kitara McCray, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

Madison Marlene Marvel, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

S.S., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

R.M., Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

Jenifer Stum, Plaintiff, represented by Mark E. Merin, Esq. , Law Office of Mark E. Merin & Paul Hajime Masuhara, III , Law Office of Mark E. Merin.

County of Sonoma, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone LLP.

Sonoma County Human Services Department, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

Sonoma County Family, Youth and Children's Services, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP.

Jerry Dunn, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone LLP.

Nick Honey, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone LLP.

Stacie Kabour, Defendant, represented by Bonnie A. Freeman , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone, LLP & Michael D. Senneff , Senneff Freeman & Bluestone LLP.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE ASSOCIATED DEADLINES ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, plaintiffs have filed an amended notice on plaintiffs' motion to strike affirmative defenses from defendants' joint answer which is currently scheduled for a hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases