CALGON CARBON CORP. v. U.S.

Slip Op. 16-4 Consol. Court No. 14-00326.

145 F.Supp.3d 1312 (2016)

CALGON CARBON CORPORATION, and Cabot Norit Americas, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Albemarle Corporation, Ningxia Huahui Activated Carbon Co., Ltd., Ningxia Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon Company, Ltd., Carbon Activated Corporation, Jacobi Carbons AB, and Jacobi Carbons, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

Dated: January 20, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Herrmann II , Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs. With him on the brief were R. Alan Luberda and David A. Hartquist .

Melissa M. Devine , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant. With her on the brief were Benjamin C. Mizer , Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Claudia Burke , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Michael T. Gagain , Attorney, Office of the Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC.

Jeffrey S. Grimson , Mowry & Grimson, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-intervenors Albemarle Corporation and Ningxia Huahui Activated Carbon Co., Ltd. With him on the brief were Kristin H. Mowry , Jill A. Cramer , Sarah M. Wyss , and Daniel R. Wilson .

Francis J. Sailer , Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-intervenor Ningxia Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon Company, Ltd. With him on brief were Kavita Mohan and Dharmendra N. Choudhary .

Gregory S. Menegaz , deKieffer & Horgan PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-intervenor Carbon Activated Corporation. With him on the brief were J. Kevin Horgan and Alexandra H. Salzman .

Claudia D. Hartleben , Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-intervenors Jacobi Carbons AB and Jacobi Carbons, Inc. With her on brief was Daniel L. Porter .


OPINION

This action challenges the Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") final results of the sixth administrative review of the antidumping ("AD") duty order on certain activated carbon from the People's Republic of China ("PRC"), covering the period of review ("POR") of April 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases