HOLLIHAN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-5.

159 F.Supp.3d 502 (2016)

Richard HOLLIHAN, Plaintiff & Putative Class Representative v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

Signed January 20, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Rudovsky , Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg, LLP, Eric J. Rothschild , Eric Wolfish , Pepper Hamilton LLP, Angus R. Love , PA Institutional Law Project, Philadelphia, PA, Thomas B. Schmidt, III , Pepper Hamilton, LLP, Harrisburg, PA, Alexandra T. Morgan-Kurtz , PA Institutional Law Project, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff & Putative Class Representative.

Jessica S. Davis , Office of Attorney General, Harrisburg, PA, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

The putative class action at bar challenges the confidential treatment regime of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections ("Department") colloquially known as the "One Good Eye" policy. Culled to its essence, this administrative policy denies cataract surgery to inmates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases