1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. TANKESLY v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION
 

TANKESLY v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION

Case No. 3:14-cv-0911.

CALVIN O. TANKESLY, JR., Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, DAMON HINIGER, [F/N/U] GARRIGA, SUSAN MARTIN, KAREN ORTON, [F/N/U] COBLE, LISA CRUM, JESSICA McELROY, DANIEL PRITCHARD, AVRIL CHAPMAN, and BRANDI KEATON, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.

December 31, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Calvin O. Tankesly, Jr., Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Corrections Corporation of America, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

Damon Hiniger, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

f/n/u Garriga, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

Susan Martin, Defendant, represented by Joseph F. Welborn, III , Butler Snow LLP & Erin Palmer Polly , Butler Snow LLP.

Karen Orton, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

f/n/u Coble, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

Jessica McElroy, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

Daniel Prichard, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

Avril Chapman, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

Brandi Keaton, Defendant, represented by James I. Pentecost , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC & Jonathan David Buckner , Pentecost & Glenn, PLLC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court having granted the plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment, the court now considers de novo the plaintiff's objections (ECF No. 185) to the magistrate judge's June 9, 2015 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (ECF No. 145).

As set...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases