MARKETTE v. XOMA CORPORATION

Case No. 3:15-CV-3425-HSG.

JOSEPH F. MARKETTE, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. XOMA CORPORATION, JOHN W. VARIAN, and PAUL D. RUBIN, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

August 27, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COOLEY LLP, JOHN C. DWYER , JESSICA VALENZUELA SANTAMARIA , AMANDA A. MAIN , BRETT H. DE JARNETTE , Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, XOMA CORPORATION, JOHN W. VARIAN, and PAUL D. RUBIN.

PUNZALAN LAW, P.C., Mark Punzalan , Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSEPH F. MARKETTE


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESET ALL RELATED DEADLINES AND EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Joseph Markette, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ("Plaintiff"), by and through his undersigned counsel, and Defendants XOMA Corporation, John Varian, and Paul Rubin ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "Complaint") was filed in the action styled Markette v. XOMA Corporation, et al., No. 3:15-CV-3425-HSG on July 24, 2015 (Dkt. No. 1) (the "Complaint");

WHEREAS, Plaintiff sent waivers of service of summons to Defendants on August 4, 2015 and Cooley LLP accepted service on their behalf;

WHEREAS, under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants are required to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before September 28, 2015;

WHEREAS, under section 78u-4(a)(3) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA") the deadline to file a motion to appoint lead plaintiff and to appoint lead counsel is September 22, 2015;

WHEREAS, on July 27, 2015, this Court issued an Order, scheduling an Initial Case Management Conference for October 27, 2015 along with related Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") deadlines.

WHEREAS, the parties agree that, in light of the deadline to file a motion to appoint lead plaintiff and lead counsel, and in the interests of judicial economy and preservation of the Court's and the parties' resources, Defendants need not respond to the pending Complaint;

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties may stipulate in writing, without a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint provided that the change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order;

WHEREAS, the Court has not issued any order setting the time within which Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE as follows, through their undersigned counsel:

1. Defendants shall not be required to, and shall not waive any rights, arguments, or defenses by not answering, moving against, or otherwise responding to the pending Complaint in the action styled Markette v. XOMA Corporation, et al., No. 3:15-CV-3425-HSG;

2. Upon appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead counsel, the parties will meet and confer to set a schedule for the filing by such lead plaintiff of a consolidated complaint and Defendants' response.

3. The Initial Case Management Conference currently scheduled for October 27, 2015, along with any associated deadlines under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules (including ADR deadlines), shall be vacated and reset after appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP Nicholas I. Porritt (to be admitted pro hac vice) Adam M. Apton (to be admitted pro hac vice) 1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 115 Washington, D.C. 20007 Tel: (202) 524-4290 Fax: (202) 363-2121 LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP Julia J. Sun (to be admitted pro hac vice) 30 Broad Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10004 Tel: (212) 363-7500 Fax: (212) 363-7171

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases