MANNING v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

No. 2:12-cv-2440 MCE AC P.

SHERMAN D. MANNING, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

August 13, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherman D. Manning, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

L. Johnson, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Kristina Doan Gruenberg , Burke Williams & Sorensen.

R. Couch, Defendant, represented by Elise Owens Thorn , CA Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General.

Humphries, C.O., Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Kristina Doan Gruenberg , Burke Williams & Sorensen.

M. Jimenez, Defendant, represented by Phillip Murray , California Correctional Peace Officers Association & Aaron G. Cohen , CCPOA.

A. Ralls, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Kristina Doan Gruenberg , Burke Williams & Sorensen.

R. Wenker, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Kristina Doan Gruenberg , Burke Williams & Sorensen.

F. Schroeder, Capt., Defendant, represented by Kelli Marie Hammond , Attorney General of the State of California.

Michael Bunnell, Defendant, represented by Kelli Marie Hammond , Attorney General of the State of California.

May, Defendant, represented by Elise Owens Thorn , CA Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General.

Colby Compton, Defendant, represented by Kelli Marie Hammond , Attorney General of the State of California.

R. O'Brien, Defendant, represented by Kelli Marie Hammond , Attorney General of the State of California.

Goldsmith, Defendant, represented by Kelli Marie Hammond , Attorney General of the State of California.

Stratton, Defendant, represented by Elise Owens Thorn , CA Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 28, 2015, this court ordered defendants to advise whether they believed a settlement conference would be beneficial in light of plaintiff's requests for a settlement conference. ECF...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases