STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. GATES, SHIELDS & FERGUSON, P.A.

Case No. 2:14-cv-02392-EFM-GLR.

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. GATES, SHIELDS & FERGUSON, P.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

August 4, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Plaintiff, represented by A. David Fawal , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Frank M. Holbrook , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Michael B. Beers , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Mimi E. Doherty , Deacy & Deacy, LLP & Dale L. Beckerman , Deacy & Deacy, LLP.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by A. David Fawal , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Frank M. Holbrook , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Michael B. Beers , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Mimi E. Doherty , Deacy & Deacy, LLP & Dale L. Beckerman , Deacy & Deacy, LLP.

Gates, Shields & Ferguson PA, Defendant, represented by Eldon J. Shields , Gates, Shields & Ferguson, PA & Mark A. Ferguson , Gates, Shields & Ferguson, PA.

James Sanders, Movant, represented by David Joseph Welder , Norris & Keplinger, LLC & Michael G. Norris , Norris & Keplinger, LLC.

Gates, Shields & Ferguson PA, Counter Claimant, represented by Eldon J. Shields , Gates, Shields & Ferguson, PA & Mark A. Ferguson , Gates, Shields & Ferguson, PA.

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Counter Defendant, represented by A. David Fawal , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Dale L. Beckerman , Deacy & Deacy, LLP, Frank M. Holbrook , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada & Michael B. Beers , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Counter Defendant, represented by A. David Fawal , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada, Dale L. Beckerman , Deacy & Deacy, LLP, Frank M. Holbrook , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada & Michael B. Beers , Butler Snow O'Mara Stevens & Cannada.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (ECF 60) seeks an order to require Plaintiffs to answer interrogatories and further respond to requests for production and for admissions. For the reasons stated in this Memorandum and Order the Court sustains...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases