1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FLORES v. VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC
 

FLORES v. VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC

Case No. 12-cv-05790-JST.

PHILLIP FLORES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 21, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip Flores, Plaintiff, represented by Caleb Marker , Ridout Marker & Ottoson LLP, Christopher Paul Ridout , Ridout Marker & Ottoson LLP, Jacob R. Rusch , Johnson Becker, PLLC, Jason J. Thompson , Sommers Schwartz, P.C., Jesse L Young , Sommer Schwartz, P.C. & Timothy J. Becker , Johnson Becker, PLLC.

Darah Doung, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, represented by Caleb Marker , Ridout Marker & Ottoson LLP, Christopher Paul Ridout , Ridout Marker & Ottoson LLP, Jacob R. Rusch , Johnson Becker, PLLC, Jason J. Thompson , Sommers Schwartz, P.C., Jesse L Young , Sommer Schwartz, P.C. & Timothy J. Becker , Johnson Becker, PLLC.

Velocity Express, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant, represented by Andrew Michael Spurchise , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Alexander Hurd Scherbatskoy , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Emily Erin O'Connor , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Jessica Xing Yun Rothenberg , Littler Mendelson, P.C. & Robert G. Hulteng , Littler Mendelson, P.C..

TransForce, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Michael Spurchise , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Alexander Hurd Scherbatskoy , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Emily Erin O'Connor , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Jessica Xing Yun Rothenberg , Littler Mendelson, P.C. & Robert G. Hulteng , Littler Mendelson, P.C..

Dynamex Operations East, LLC, Defendant, represented by Alexander Hurd Scherbatskoy , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Andrew Michael Spurchise , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Jessica Xing Yun Rothenberg , Littler Mendelson, P.C. & Robert G. Hulteng , Littler Mendelson, P.C..

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Re: ECF No. 162

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Amend the April 16, 2015 Partial Summary Judgment Order to Certify the Same for Interlocutory Appeal ("Motion"). ECF. No. 162. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases