1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. v. PETRAEUS
 

U.S. v. PETRAEUS

Civil Action No. 3:15-CR-047-DCK.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID HOWELL PETRAEUS, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

May 11, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

The Associated Press, Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Bloomberg L.P., Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

The Charlotte Observer Publishing Company, Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

Dow Jones & Company, Inc., Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

First Look Media, Inc., Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

National Public Radio, Inc., Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

The New York Times Company, Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

The Washington Post, Movant, represented by Jonathan E. Buchan, Jr. , McGuireWoods LLP & KatieLynn Boyd Townsend , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by James P. Melendres , National Security Division, Jill Westmoreland Rose , United States Attorney & Richard S. Scott , National Security Division.

ORDER

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding scheduling concerns and the status of pending motions. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and immediate review of the status of this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases