1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. McKEEN-CHAPLIN v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK
 

McKEEN-CHAPLIN v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK

No. 2:12-CV-03035-GEB-AC.

GINA MCKEEN-CHAPLIN, individually, on behalf of others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

April 17, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gina McKeen-Chaplin, Plaintiff, represented by Matthew C. Helland , Nichols Kaster & Anderson, LLP & Daniel Solomon Brome , Nichols Kaster, LLP.

Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B., Defendant, represented by Howard M. Knee , Blank Rome LLP & Michael Lester Ludwig , Blank Rome LLP.

ORDER DENYING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pending are cross motions for summary judgment concerning Defendant Provident Savings Bank, FSB's ("Provident") affirmative defense, in which Provident asserts it was justified in not paying Plaintiffs overtime wages prescribed in the federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases