1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 108 F.Supp.3d
  5. 108 F.Supp.3d 1167 (2015)
 

HUGHES v. JUDD

Case No. 8:12-cv-568-T-23MAP.

108 F.Supp.3d 1167 (2015)

Chanda HUGHES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Grady JUDD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.

Signed April 16, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Hayden , Berger Singerman, LLP, Miami, FL, Joseph Peter Rindone , Baker & McKenzie, LLP, New York, NY, Maria V. Morris , Montgomery, AL, Miriam Fahsi Haskell , Tania Galloni , Miami, FL, Steven M. Chasin , Baker & McKenzie, LLP, Washington, DC, Jody E. Owens, II , Jackson, MS, Manoj Gorantla Govindaiah , Raices, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiffs.

Hank B. Campbell , Jonathan Barnet Trohn , Robert J. Aranda , Jennifer Megan Vasquez , Valenti, Campbell, Trohn, Tamayo & Aranda, PA, Lakeland, FL, William Thompson McKinley , William McKinley Law, P.A., Bartow, FL, Jeanelle G. Bronson , Patrick H. Telan , Ramon Vazquez , Jennifer L. Phillips , Philip J. Wallace , Grower, Ketcham, Rutherford, Bronson, Eide & Telan, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendants.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND FINDINGS OF FACT

[U]nder the Constitution, the first question to be answered is not whose plan is best, but in what branch of the Government is lodged the authority to initially devise the plan. This does not mean that constitutional rights are not to be scrupulously observed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases