1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 255 F.Supp.3d
  5. 255 F.Supp.3d 636 (2015)
 

VAN SCYOC v. EQUITRANS, L.P.

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-01735.

255 F.Supp.3d 636 (2015)

Randal L. VAN SCYOC and Charlene S. Van Scyoc, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EQUITRANS, L.P., EQT Production Company, and Lawrence H. Miller and Eleanor S. Miller, husband and wife, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

Signed March 23, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin G. Weber , Pepper Hamilton , Harrisburg, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Nicolle R. Snyder Bagnell , Lucas Liben, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants.

OPINION

This case started in state court. The Defendants removed it, invoking federal question jurisdiction by stating that what appeared to be paradigm state law claims really arise under a law of the United States. ECF No. 1, at ¶ 9. Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases