1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STEUBEN FOODS, INC. v. GEA PROCESS ENGINEERING, INC.
 

STEUBEN FOODS, INC. v. GEA PROCESS ENGINEERING, INC.

No. 12-CV-00904-EAW-JJM.

STEUBEN FOODS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GEA PROCESS ENGINEERING, INC., d/b/a GEA PROCOMAC and GEA PROCOMAC S.p.A., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

March 9, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steuben Foods, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Joseph L. Stanganelli , Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Mark Eric Galvez , Hiscock & Barclay, Thomas J. Fisher , Oblon McClelland Maier & Neustadt, LLP & Thomas B. Cronmiller , Hiscock & Barclay LLP.

GEA Process Engineering, Inc., Defendant, represented by Benjamin L. Kiersz , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, William P. Atkins , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

GEA Procomac S.p.A., Defendant, represented by William P. Atkins , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Benjamin L. Kiersz , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

GEA Process Engineering, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Benjamin L. Kiersz , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

GEA Procomac S.p.A., Counter Claimant, represented by Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

GEA Process Engineering, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

GEA Procomac S.p.A., Counter Defendant, represented by Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

GEA Procomac S.p.A., Counter Claimant, represented by Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

Steuben Foods, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Joseph L. Stanganelli , Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Christopher E. Blank , Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Thomas J. Fisher , Oblon McClelland Maier & Neustadt, LLP & Thomas B. Cronmiller , Hiscock & Barclay LLP.

GEA Process Engineering, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Benjamin L. Kiersz , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, William P. Atkins , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

Steuben Foods, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Joseph L. Stanganelli , Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Christopher E. Blank , Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Mark Eric Galvez , Hiscock & Barclay, Thomas J. Fisher , Oblon McClelland Maier & Neustadt, LLP & Thomas B. Cronmiller , Hiscock & Barclay LLP.

GEA Procomac S.p.A., Counter Claimant, represented by William P. Atkins , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Benjamin L. Kiersz , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Michael A. Brady , Hagerty & Brady.

Steuben Foods, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Joseph L. Stanganelli , Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Christopher E. Blank , Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Mark Eric Galvez , Hiscock & Barclay, Thomas J. Fisher , Oblon McClelland Maier & Neustadt, LLP & Thomas B. Cronmiller , Hiscock & Barclay LLP.

DECISION AND ORDER

This patent infringement action has been referred to me for supervision of pretrial proceedings [89].1 Before me is the motion of defendants GEA Process Engineering, Inc. ("GPNA") and GEA Procomac S.p.A. ("GEA") to stay this action pending completion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases