1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HATAMIAN v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
 

HATAMIAN v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.

Case No. 14-cv-00226-YGR.

BABAK HATAMIAN, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 6, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Babak Hatamian, Plaintiff, represented by Joy Ann Kruse , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Lussu Dennj Salvatore, Plaintiff, represented by Joy Ann Kruse , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Defendant, represented by Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Ming M Zhu , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Rory P. Read, Defendant, represented by Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Ming M Zhu , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Thomas J. Seifert, Defendant, represented by Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Ming M Zhu , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Lisa T. Su, Defendant, represented by Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Ming M Zhu , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Richard A. Bergman, Defendant, represented by Patrick Edward Gibbs , Latham & Watkins LLP & Ming M Zhu , Latham and Watkins LLP.

KBC Asset Management NV, Movant, represented by Sharon Maine Lee , Lieff Cabraser Heimann Bernstein, William S. Norton , Motley Rice LLC, James Michael Hughes , Motley Rice LLC, Joy Ann Kruse , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP & Jonathan Gardner , Labaton Sucharow LLP.

Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System, Movant, represented by Michael M. Goldberg , Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP.

Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Movant, represented by Carol C. Villegas , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Jonathan Gardner , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Paul J Scarlato , Labaton Sucharow LLP, Sharon Maine Lee , Lieff Cabraser Heimann Bernstein & Nicole Catherine Lavallee , Berman DeValerio.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is defendants' Motion to Strike certain paragraphs from plaintiffs Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Dkt. No. 61 ("CCAC")), on the basis that such paragraphs are attributed to two confidential witnesses ("CWs") who have since recanted. (Dkt. No. 70.) In support thereof, defendant have filed declarations from the two CWs. (Dkt. Nos. 71, 72.) Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases