1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ABSTRAX, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
 

ABSTRAX, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

Case No. 2:14-CV-158-JRG.

ABSTRAX, INC., Plaintiff, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division.

January 12, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Folsom, Mediator, Pro Se.

Shane A Nelson, Technical Advisor, Pro Se.

Abstrax, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by John Jeffrey Eichmann , Dovel & Luner, Daymon Jeffrey Rambin , Capshaw DeRieux LLP, Elizabeth L DeRieux , Capshaw DeRieux LLP, Jonas B Jacobson , Dovel & Luner, Kayvan B Noroozi , Dovel & Luner, Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III , Capshaw DeRieux LLP & Robert Christopher Bunt , Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C..

Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant, represented by Katherine Kelly Lutton , Fish & Richardson, Christopher O Green , Fish & Richardson PC, Christopher Scott Marchese , Fish & Richardson, Elizabeth Iglesias , Fish & Richardson, Jackob Ben-Ezra , Fish & Richardson PC, Jane J Du , Fish & Richardson PC, John Philip Brinkmann , Fish & Richardson PC, Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP, Thomas M Melsheimer , Fish & Richardson, William Robert Lamb , Gillam & Smith, LLP & Michael Robert Rueckheim , Fish & Richardson PC.

Hewlett-Packard Company, Counter Claimant, represented by Katherine Kelly Lutton , Fish & Richardson, Elizabeth Iglesias , Fish & Richardson & Michael Robert Rueckheim , Fish & Richardson PC.

Abstrax, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by John Jeffrey Eichmann , Dovel & Luner, Daymon Jeffrey Rambin , Capshaw DeRieux LLP, Elizabeth L DeRieux , Capshaw DeRieux LLP, Jonas B Jacobson , Dovel & Luner, Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III , Capshaw DeRieux LLP & Robert Christopher Bunt , Parker, Bunt & Ainsworth, P.C..

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.

Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Plaintiff Abstrax, Inc. ("Plaintiff") (Dkt. No. 80, filed on October 23, 2014), the response of Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("Defendant") (Dkt. No. 92, filed on November 11, 2014), the reply of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 107, filed on November 20, 2014), and the sur-reply of Defendant (Dkt. No. 115-5, filed on November...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases