KELLY J. RICHARDSON, and JAMES POWELL, personally and as next friend for I.R., a minor, and S.P., a minor, Plaintiffs,
v.
EMILIE SCHUBERT, in her individual capacity, GINGER VAN WINKLE, in her individual capacity, ERIN WIRTZ, in her individual capacity, JENNIE SMITH, in her individual capacity, KRISTIN LEMON, in her individual capacity, CARLOS CRUTCH, in his individual capacity, LINDSEY VERNOOY, in her individual capacity, DANIELLE SANTILI-DAY, in her individual capacity, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Emilie Schubert, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Roger W. Perry , Hurley Re, P.C..
Ginger VanWinkle, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Roger W. Perry , Hurley Re, P.C..
Erin Wirtz, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Vanessa A. Nordyke , Oregon Department of Justice & Dirk L. Pierson , Department of Justice.
Jennie Smith, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Vanessa A. Nordyke , Oregon Department of Justice & Dirk L. Pierson , Department of Justice.
Kristin Lemon, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Vanessa A. Nordyke , Oregon Department of Justice & Dirk L. Pierson , Department of Justice.
Carlos Crutch, in his individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Vanessa A. Nordyke , Oregon Department of Justice & Dirk L. Pierson , Department of Justice.
Lindsey VerNooy, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Vanessa A. Nordyke , Oregon Department of Justice & Dirk L. Pierson , Department of Justice.
Danielle Santili-Day, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Vanessa A. Nordyke , Oregon Department of Justice & Dirk L. Pierson , Department of Justice.
United States District Court, D. Oregon.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation [40] on November 14, 2014, in which she recommends that this Court deny Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [28]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
