1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROSS v. VAN WINKLE
 

ROSS v. VAN WINKLE

No. CV-14-01480-PHX-NVW (ESW).

Douglas Eric Ross, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey Van Winkle, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

December 23, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Eric Ross, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Unknown Contreras, Defendant, represented by Neil Singh , Office of the Attorney General.

Unknown Akin, Defendant, represented by Neil Singh , Office of the Attorney General.

ORDER

EILEEN S. WILLETT, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a "Response by Plaintiff, Douglas Eric Ross, to defendant(s) answer to Plaintiffs complaint" (Doc. 40). The Court strikes Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 40) as an improper pleading.

Rule 7(a)(1) and (2), Fed.R.Civ.P, provides for a complaint and an answer to a complaint. A reply to an answer is only permitted "if the court orders one." Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a)(7). Because the Court did not order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases