1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. YATES v. AUTO CITY 76
 

YATES v. AUTO CITY 76

No. C-10-3932 EMC.

CRAIG YATES, Plaintiff, v. AUTO CITY 76, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

November 25, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig Yates, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas E. Frankovich , Thomas E. Frankovich, APLC.

Auto City 76, Defendant, represented by Thomas Issa Saberi , Law Office of William H. Paynter & James M. Dombroski .

R.A.T. Oil Inc, a California corporation, Defendant, represented by Thomas Issa Saberi , Law Office of William H. Paynter & James M. Dombroski .

Canadian American Oil Company, a California corporation, Defendant, represented by Thomas Issa Saberi , Law Office of William H. Paynter & James M. Dombroski .

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Docket No. 101)

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

On November 5, 2014, this Court issued an order granting Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment.1 Yates v. Auto City 76, C-10-3932 EMC, 2014 WL 5767506 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2014). The Court concluded that Plaintiff Craig Yates "cannot recover damages for any visits beyond the first visit to Auto City 76" because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases