HAMILTON v. LAKE COUNTY

Cause No. 2:14-CV-00133 RLM-JEM.

DENNIS HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division.

October 31, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis Hamilton, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Lake County, Indiana, Defendant, represented by John M Kopack , John M Kopack & Associates.

Lake County Commissioners, Defendant, represented by John M Kopack , John M Kopack & Associates.

John Buncich, In his official capacity as Lake County Sheriff, Defendant, represented by John P Bushemi , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP, Michael J Bolde , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP & Patricia Hass , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP.

Willie Stewart, Jr., In his official capacity as Warden, Defendant, represented by John P Bushemi , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP & Michael J Bolde , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP.

Willie Stewart, Jr., In his official capacity as Warden, Defendant, represented by Patricia Hass

Lake County Jail, Defendant, represented by John P Bushemi , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP.

Lake County Jail, Defendant, represented by Michael J Bolde , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP & Patricia Hass , Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP.

Keith Soderquist, In his official capacity as Mayor, city of Lake Station, Defendant, represented by Liberty L Roberts , Church Church Hittle & Antrim LLP.

Lake Station Police Department, Defendant, represented by Liberty L Roberts , Church Church Hittle & Antrim LLP.

Kevin Garber, In his official capacity as Lake Station Police Chief, Defendant, represented by Liberty L Roberts , Church Church Hittle & Antrim LLP.

Lake County Commissioners, Counter Claimant, represented by John M Kopack , John M Kopack & Associates.

Lake County, Indiana, Counter Claimant, represented by John M Kopack , John M Kopack & Associates.

Dennis Hamilton, Counter Defendant, Pro Se.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) and Local Rule 72-1

JOHN E. MARTIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on an Order to Show Cause [DE 24], issued by the Court on August 28, 2014.

On July 1, 2014, Plaintiff's attorney of record moved to withdraw his representation due to a conflict of interest. On July 2, 2014, the Court granted the motion and set the matter for a hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases