1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GITSON v. TRADER JOE'S COMPANY
 

GITSON v. TRADER JOE'S COMPANY

Case No. 13-CV-1333 VC.

AMY GITSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRADER JOE'S COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

November 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CARLA CHRISTOFFERSON , ADAM G. LEVINE , KATE IDES , DANIEL J. FARIA , O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Los Angeles, California

RANDALL W. EDWARDS , O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Trader Joe's Company.

Colin H. Dunn , CLIFFORD LAW OFFICES, P.C., Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Amy Gitson and Deborah Ross.

JOINT STATUS UPDATE RE: SCHEDULING OF MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.

In accordance with this Court's order entered on September 3, 2014, and attached as Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs Amy Gitson and Deborah Ross and Defendant Trader Joe's Company (collectively, the "Parties"), respectfully submit this joint status update regarding the scheduling of the mandatory settlement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases