1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 

O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 13-03826-EMC.

DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, DAVID KHAN, MATTHEW MANAHAN, WILSON ROLLE, JR., and WILLIAM ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

September 17, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ROBERT JON HENDRICKS STEPHEN L. TAEUSCH CAITLIN V. MAY San Francisco, California Attorneys for Defendant UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

SHANNON LISS-RIORDAN , pro hac vice LICHTEN & LISS-RIORDAN, P.C., Boston, MA, MONIQUE OLIVIER , DUCKWORTH, PETERS, LEBOWITZ, OLIVIER LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Plaintiffs DOUGLAS O'CONNOR, THOMAS COLOPY, DAVID KHAN, MATTHEW MANAHAN, WILSON ROLLE, JR., and WILLIAM ANDERSON

STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF DAVID KHAN WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

This stipulation is entered into pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by and between Plaintiff David Khan ("Khan") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") (collectively, the "Parties").

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases