PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC

Nos. 8:12CV122, 8:12CV123, 8:12CV124, 8:12CV125, 8:12CV126

PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, Defendant. PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., d/b/a SPRINT PCS, Defendant. PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendant. PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION, d/b/a U.S. CELLULAR, Defendant. PRISM TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska.

August 15, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prism Technologies, Plaintiff, represented by Aakash B. Jariwala , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Aaron M. Frankel , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Andre J. Bahou , PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Cristina Martinez , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Daniel J. Fischer , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Jonathan S. Caplan , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Lisa Kobialka , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Marcus A. Colucci , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Mark A. Baghdassarian , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Matthew W. Olinzock , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Michael C. Cox , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Paul Andre , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM & William N. Hannah , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM.

Cellco Partnership, Defendant, represented by Amy M. Locher , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM, Charles B. Molster, III , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, David A. Blagg , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM, Joseph C. Masullo , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Kurt A. Mathas , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Michael K. Huffer , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM & Thomas M. Dunham , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM.

Verizon Communications Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Amy M. Locher , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM, Charles B. Molster, III , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Kurt A. Mathas , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM & Michael K. Huffer , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM.

Cellco Partnership, Counter Claimant, represented by Amy M. Locher , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM, Charles B. Molster, III , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Joseph C. Masullo , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Kurt A. Mathas , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Michael K. Huffer , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM & Thomas M. Dunham , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM.

Prism Technologies, Counter Defendant, represented by Aakash B. Jariwala , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Aaron M. Frankel , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Andre J. Bahou , PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Cristina Martinez , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Daniel J. Fischer , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Jonathan S. Caplan , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Lisa Kobialka , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Marcus A. Colucci , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Mark A. Baghdassarian , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Matthew W. Olinzock , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Michael C. Cox , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Paul Andre , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM & William N. Hannah , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM.

Cellco Partnership, Counter Claimant, represented by Amy M. Locher , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM, Charles B. Molster, III , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, David A. Blagg , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM, Joseph C. Masullo , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Kurt A. Mathas , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM, Michael K. Huffer , CASSEM, TIERNEY LAW FIRM & Thomas M. Dunham , WINSTON, STRAWN LAW FIRM.

Prism Technologies, Counter Defendant, represented by Aakash B. Jariwala , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Aaron M. Frankel , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Andre J. Bahou , PRISM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Cristina Martinez , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Daniel J. Fischer , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Jonathan S. Caplan , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Lisa Kobialka , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Marcus A. Colucci , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Mark A. Baghdassarian , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Matthew W. Olinzock , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM, Michael C. Cox , KOLEY, JESSEN LAW FIRM, Paul Andre , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM & William N. Hannah , KRAMER, LEVIN LAW FIRM.


ORDER

LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court in regard to numerous requests to file documents as restricted or under seal. The Court finds that the parties may use their discretion when filing such documents as restricted or under seal; and no separate motion need be filed.

If opposing counsel at any time objects to documents having been restricted or sealed, an appropriate request may be made to the Court, in writing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases