1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RICHARDSON v. MACK MECHANICAL, INC.
 

RICHARDSON v. MACK MECHANICAL, INC.

No. 2-12-0109.

TERRY RICHARDSON d/b/a Terry Richardson Concrete, LLC v. MACK MECHANICAL, INC.; and AMERICAN SAFETY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division.

August 4, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terry Richardson Concrete LLC, Plaintiff, represented by J. Brad Scarbrough , Law Office of Brad Scarbrough, PLC, Timothy A. Bishop , Law Office of Brad Scarbrough, PLC & Tyce S. Smith , Smith & Turley.

Mack Mechanical, Inc, Defendant, represented by John L. Lightner , Baird, Lightner, Millsap & Harpool, PC, William A. Lascara , Pender & Coward, PC & William I. H. Acuff , Acuff & Acuff, P.C..

American Safety Casualty Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by John L. Lightner , Baird, Lightner, Millsap & Harpool, PC, William A. Lascara , Pender & Coward, PC & William I. H. Acuff , Acuff & Acuff, P.C..

Mack Mechanical, Inc, Third Party Plaintiff, represented by John L. Lightner , Baird, Lightner, Millsap & Harpool, PC, William A. Lascara , Pender & Coward, PC & William I. H. Acuff , Acuff & Acuff, P.C..

Terry Richardson Concrete LLC, Third Party Defendant, represented by J. Brad Scarbrough , Law Office of Brad Scarbrough, PLC, Timothy A. Bishop , Law Office of Brad Scarbrough, PLC & Tyce S. Smith , Smith & Turley.

Mack Mechanical, Inc, Counter Plaintiff, represented by John L. Lightner , Baird, Lightner, Millsap & Harpool, PC, William A. Lascara , Pender & Coward, PC & William I. H. Acuff , Acuff & Acuff, P.C..

Terry Richardson Concrete LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by J. Brad Scarbrough , Law Office of Brad Scarbrough, PLC, Timothy A. Bishop , Law Office of Brad Scarbrough, PLC & Tyce S. Smith , Smith & Turley.

ORDER

JULIET E. GRIFFIN, Magistrate Judge.

Counsel for the parties called the Court on July 11, 2014, at which time the following matters were addressed:

1. The plaintiff's motion for extension of discovery deadline and motion to compel deposition (Docket Entry No. 55) was GRANTED in part and MOOT in part.1

2. The plaintiff's motion for protective order (Docket Entry No. 61) was GRANTED.

3. The plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases