YORK v. LUCAS COUNTY

Case No. 3:13 cv 1335.

Troy York, Plaintiff, v. Lucas County, Ohio, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

July 22, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Troy York, Plaintiff, represented by Michael D. Portnoy .

Lucas County, Ohio, Defendant, represented by Andrew K. Ranazzi , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County, Kevin A. Pituch , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County & John A. Borell, Sr. , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County.

Lucas County Board of Commissioners, Defendant, represented by Andrew K. Ranazzi , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County, Kevin A. Pituch , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County & John A. Borell, Sr. , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County.

Deborah Gasser, Defendant, represented by Andrew K. Ranazzi , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County, Kevin A. Pituch , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County & John A. Borell, Sr. , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County.

Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, Defendant, represented by Andrew K. Ranazzi , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County, Kevin A. Pituch , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County & John A. Borell, Sr. , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County.

John and/or Jane Doe Nurses and Corrections Officers, Defendant, represented by Andrew K. Ranazzi , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County, Kevin A. Pituch , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County & John A. Borell, Sr. , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County.

John and/or Jane Doe Policy Makers, Defendant, represented by Andrew K. Ranazzi , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County, John A. Borell, Sr. , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County & Kevin A. Pituch , Office of the Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas County.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge.

BRIEF BACKGROUND

This case was commenced in state court and removed by Defendants in June 2013. The Defendants promptly filed a motion to dismiss which was granted in part, and held in abeyance, in part, in February 2014. Plaintiff sought reconsideration of that ruling and the same was denied in March 2014. Plaintiff then sought a motion for default judgment as Defendants had not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases