HYDRODYNAMIC INDUSTRIAL CO LTD., a Hong Kong corporation Plaintiff,
v.
GREEN MAX DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant.
United States District Court, C.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 10, 2014.
June 10, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Hydrodynamic Industrial Co Ltd, Plaintiff, represented by Yuri Mikulka , Stradling Yocca Carlson and Rauth & Sarah S Brooks , Stradling Yocca Carlson and Rauth.
Hydrodynamic Industrial Co Ltd, Counter Defendant, represented by Yuri Mikulka , Stradling Yocca Carlson and Rauth & Sarah S Brooks , Stradling Yocca Carlson and Rauth.
Hydrodynamic Industrial Co Ltd, Counter Defendant, represented by Yuri Mikulka , Stradling Yocca Carlson and Rauth & Sarah S Brooks , Stradling Yocca Carlson and Rauth.
United States District Court, C.D. California.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION [146]
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Following a jury verdict finding that Defendant Green Max Distributors, Inc., wilfully infringed Plaintiff Hydrodynamic Industrial Company LTD.'s valid patent, Hydrodynamic requests that the Court enjoin Green Max from selling its X-treme sea scooters. (ECF No. 146.) Hydrodynamic argues that it has suffered, and will continue...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.