1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ROGERS v. MAKOL
 

ROGERS v. MAKOL

No. 3:13-cv-00946 (JAM).

WILLIAM ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. NAIF MAKOL, SKOOTERS RESTAURANT II, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 12, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Rogers, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Naif Makof, Defendant, represented by Timothy F. Murphy , Skoler, Abbott & Presser, P.C..

Scooters Restaurant II, Inc., Defendant, represented by Timothy F. Murphy , Skoler, Abbott & Presser, P.C..

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. #18]

JEFFREY ALKER MEYERS, District Judge.

Plaintiff William Rogers, pro se, brings this action against defendants Skooter's Restaurant II, Inc., and its alleged owner, Naif Makol,1 for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII") and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases