J.F. v. NEW HAVEN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

No. C 13-03808 SI.

J.F., a minor, by her Guardian ad litem CHERISE ABEL-IRBY, Plaintiff, v. NEW HAVEN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 22, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J.F., by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Cherise Abel-Irby, Plaintiff, represented by Nicole D. Hodge , Law Offices of Nicole D. Hodge.

Cherise Abel-Irby, Plaintiff, represented by Nicole D. Hodge , Law Offices of Nicole D. Hodge.

New Haven Unified School District, Defendant, represented by Kimberly Anne Smith , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP, David Reis Mishook , Fagen Friedman and Fulfrost LLP & Laurie Elizabeth Reynolds , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP.

Sarah Kappler, in her official capacity, Defendant, represented by Kimberly Anne Smith , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP, David Reis Mishook , Fagen Friedman and Fulfrost LLP & Laurie Elizabeth Reynolds , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP.

Abhi Brar, as an individual and in his Official capacity, Defendant, represented by Kimberly Anne Smith , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP, David Reis Mishook , Fagen Friedman and Fulfrost LLP & Laurie Elizabeth Reynolds , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP.

Chris Perry, as an individual and in his Official capacity, Defendant, represented by Kimberly Anne Smith , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP, David Reis Mishook , Fagen Friedman and Fulfrost LLP & Laurie Elizabeth Reynolds , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP.

Angela Higgerson, as an individual and in her Official capacity, Defendant, represented by Kimberly Anne Smith , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP, David Reis Mishook , Fagen Friedman and Fulfrost LLP & Laurie Elizabeth Reynolds , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP.

Kenneth Pando, as an individual and in his Official, Defendant, represented by Kimberly Anne Smith , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost, LLP, David Reis Mishook , Fagen Friedman and Fulfrost LLP & Laurie Elizabeth Reynolds , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP.


ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge

Now before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint. This matter is scheduled for hearing on April 25, 2014. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the defendants' motion to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases