1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. OPPERMAN v. PATH, INC.
 

OPPERMAN v. PATH, INC.

Case No. 13-cv-00453-JST.

MARC OPPERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PATH, INC., et al., Defendants. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES: Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-cv-00453-JST. Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-cv-1515-JST. Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., No. 12-cv-1529-JST. Gutierrez v. Instagram Inc., No. 12-cv-6550-JST.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

February 7, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054), Maren J. Clouse (Bar No. 228726), Jenny Q. Shen (Bar No. 278883), Clayton C. James HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Menlo Park, California, Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC., a California Corporation.

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP, Judith R. Nemsick , Christopher G. Kelly , New York, NY, Shelley G. Hurwitz , HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP, Los Angeles, CA, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ROVIO ENTERTAINMENT LTD. S/H/A ROVIO MOBILE OY.

COOLEY LLP, Mazda Antia , San Diego, CA. ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS FACEBOOK, INC., INSTAGRAM, LLC AND KIK INTERACTIVE, INC.

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, Keith Henneke , Los Angeles, CA, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT FOURSQUARE LABS, INC..

Michele Floyd (SBN 163031), ZWILLGEN LAW LLP, San Francisco, CA, Marc J. Zwillinger (admitted pro hac vice), Jacob A. Sommer (admitted pro hac vice). ZWILLGEN PLLC Washington, DC ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC. AND CHILLINGO LTD.

FENWICK & WEST LLP, Tyler G. Newby (Bar No. 205790), San Francisco, CA, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT PATH, INC..

Michael H. Page (Bar No. 154913), DURIE TANGRI LLP, San Francisco, CA, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS YELP INC. AND FOODSPOTTING, INC.

Timothy L. Alger , PERKINS COIE, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Amanda J. Beane , PERKINS COIE, LLP, Seattle, WA, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT TWITTER, INC.

DHILLON & SMITH LLP, Harmeet K. Dhillon , San Francisco, CA, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GOWALLA INC.

MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP, Jeffrey M. Movit , New York, NY, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ZEPTOLAB UK LIMITED.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONDUCT OF MOTION TO DISMISS HEARINGS THE THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES: Opperman Hernandez Pirozzi Gutierrez

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

STIPULATION AND ORDER

Subject to the Court's review and approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AND ORDERED as follows:

WHEREAS, the Defendants' motions to dismiss are scheduled for hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases