1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 13 F.Supp.3d
  5. 13 F.Supp.3d 888 (2014)
 

SMEGO v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES CORP.

No. 10-CV-3334.

13 F.Supp.3d 888 (2014)

Richard SMEGO, et al. Plaintiffs, v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES CORP., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.

January 10, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Alan Noll , Noll Law Office LLC, Springfield, IL, Mark A. Brittingham , Southern Illinois University School of Law, Carbondale, IL, for Plaintiffs.

Matthew S. Hendricks , Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice LLP, St. Louis, MO, Christopher L. Higgerson , Ryan E. Donaldson , Terence J. Corrigan , Karen L. McNaught , Illinois Attorney General, Springfield, IL, for Defendants.

OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge.

On May 13, 2013, the Court denied the parties' respective summary judgment motions. The Court concluded that, regardless whether the "mechanically separated chicken" served at the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center violates federal regulations, jury questions remain regarding whether the food served at the Center meets constitutional standards. The parties have filed renewed motions for summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases