EIDSON v. MEDTRONIC, INC.

Case Nos.: 13-CV-02049-LHK, 13-CV-01502-LHK.

981 F.Supp.2d 868 (2013)

Richard EIDSON, Plaintiff, v. MEDTRONIC, INC.; Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Defendants. Scott Bell and April Bell, Plaintiffs, v. Medtronic, Inc.; Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

October 3, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Khaldoun Baghdadi , Sara M. Peters , Walkup Melodia Kelly & Schoenberger, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Michael Kevin Brown , Mildred Segura , Reed Smith LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Courtland Carter Chillingworth , Reed Smith , Oakland, CA, for Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SCOTT AND APRIL BELL'S COMPLAINT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD EIDSON'S COMPLAINT

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Scott and April Bell bring this action based on harmful side effects Scott Bell suffered after undergoing spinal surgery in which his surgeon used a medical device produced by Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases